Spring Cloud Gateway 雪崩了，我人都傻了原创
3年前
714737
大家好，我又人傻了。这次的经验告诉我们，出来写代码偷的懒，迟早要还的。
问题现象与背景
昨晚我们的网关雪崩了一段时间，现象是：
1.不断有各种微服务报异常：在写 HTTP 响应的时候，连接已经关闭：
reactor.netty.http.client.PrematureCloseException: Connection prematurely closed BEFORE response
2.同时还有请求还没读取完，连接已经关闭的异常：
org.springframework.http.converter.HttpMessageNotReadableException: I/O error while reading input message; nested exception is java.io.IOException: UT000128: Remote peer closed connection before all data could be read
3.前端不断有请求超时的报警，504 Gateway Time-out
4.网关进程不断健康检查失败而被重启
5.重启后的网关进程，立刻请求数量激增，每个实例峰值 2000 qps，闲时每个实例 500 qps，忙时由于有扩容也能保持每个实例在 1000 qps 以内，然后健康检查接口就很长时间没有响应，导致实例不断重启
其中，1 和 2 的问题应该是应为网关不断重启，并且由于某些原因优雅关闭失败导致强制关闭，强制关闭导致连接被强制断开从而有 1 和 2 相关的异常。
我们的网关是基于 Spring Cloud Gateway 实现的，并且有自动根据 CPU 负载扩容的机制。奇怪的是在请求数量彪增的时候，CPU 利用率并没有提高很多，保持在 60% 左右，由于 CPU 负载没有达到扩容的界限，所以一直没有自动扩容。为了快速解决问题，我们手动扩容了几个网关实例，将网关单实例负载控制在了 1000 以内，暂时解决了问题。
问题分析
为了彻底解决这个问题，我们使用 JFR 分析。首先先根据已知的线索去分析：
1.Spring Cloud Gateway 是基于 Spring-WebFlux 实现的异步响应式网关，http 业务线程是有限的（默认是 2 * 可以使用的 CPU 个数，我们这里是 4）。
2.网关进程不断健康检查失败，健康检查调用的是 /actuator/health 接口，这个接口一直超时。
健康检查接口超时一般有两个原因：
1.健康检查接口检查某个组件的时候，阻塞住了。例如数据库如果卡住，那么可能数据库健康检查会一直没有返回。
2.http 线程池没来得及处理健康检查请求，请求就超时了。
我们可以先去看 JFR 中的定时堆栈，看是否有 http 线程卡在健康检查上面。查看出问题后的线程堆栈，重点关注那 4 个 http 线程，结果发现这 4 个线程的堆栈基本一样，都是在执行 Redis 命令：
"reactor-http-nio-1" #68 daemon prio=5 os_prio=0 cpu=70832.99ms elapsed=199.98s tid=0x0000ffffb2f8a740 nid=0x69 waiting on condition [0x0000fffe8adfc000]
java.lang.Thread.State: TIMED_WAITING (parking)
at jdk.internal.misc.Unsafe.park(java.base@11.0.8/Native Method)
- parking to wait for <0x00000007d50eddf8> (a java.util.concurrent.CompletableFuture$Signaller)
at java.util.concurrent.locks.LockSupport.parkNanos(java.base@11.0.8/LockSupport.java:234)
at java.util.concurrent.CompletableFuture$Signaller.block(java.base@11.0.8/CompletableFuture.java:1798)
at java.util.concurrent.ForkJoinPool.managedBlock(java.base@11.0.8/ForkJoinPool.java:3128)
at java.util.concurrent.CompletableFuture.timedGet(java.base@11.0.8/CompletableFuture.java:1868)
at java.util.concurrent.CompletableFuture.get(java.base@11.0.8/CompletableFuture.java:2021)
at io.lettuce.core.protocol.AsyncCommand.await(AsyncCommand.java:83)
at io.lettuce.core.internal.Futures.awaitOrCancel(Futures.java:244)
at io.lettuce.core.FutureSyncInvocationHandler.handleInvocation(FutureSyncInvocationHandler.java:75)
at io.lettuce.core.internal.AbstractInvocationHandler.invoke(AbstractInvocationHandler.java:80)
at com.sun.proxy.$Proxy245.get(Unknown Source)
at org.springframework.data.redis.connection.lettuce.LettuceStringCommands.get(LettuceStringCommands.java:68)
at org.springframework.data.redis.connection.DefaultedRedisConnection.get(DefaultedRedisConnection.java:267)
at org.springframework.data.redis.connection.DefaultStringRedisConnection.get(DefaultStringRedisConnection.java:406)
at org.springframework.data.redis.core.DefaultValueOperations$1.inRedis(DefaultValueOperations.java:57)
at org.springframework.data.redis.core.AbstractOperations$ValueDeserializingRedisCallback.doInRedis(AbstractOperations.java:60)
at org.springframework.data.redis.core.RedisTemplate.execute(RedisTemplate.java:222)
at org.springframework.data.redis.core.RedisTemplate.execute(RedisTemplate.java:189)
at org.springframework.data.redis.core.AbstractOperations.execute(AbstractOperations.java:96)
at org.springframework.data.redis.core.DefaultValueOperations.get(DefaultValueOperations.java:53)
at com.jojotech.apigateway.filter.AccessCheckFilter.traced(AccessCheckFilter.java:196)
at com.jojotech.apigateway.filter.AbstractTracedFilter.filter(AbstractTracedFilter.java:39)
at org.springframework.cloud.gateway.handler.FilteringWebHandler$GatewayFilterAdapter.filter(FilteringWebHandler.java:137)
at org.springframework.cloud.gateway.filter.OrderedGatewayFilter.filter(OrderedGatewayFilter.java:44)
at org.springframework.cloud.gateway.handler.FilteringWebHandler$DefaultGatewayFilterChain.lambda$filter$0(FilteringWebHandler.java:117)
at org.springframework.cloud.gateway.handler.FilteringWebHandler$DefaultGatewayFilterChain$$Lambda$1478/0x0000000800b84c40.get(Unknown Source)
at reactor.core.publisher.MonoDefer.subscribe(MonoDefer.java:44)
at reactor.core.publisher.Mono.subscribe(Mono.java:4150)
at com.jojotech.apigateway.common.TracedMono.subscribe(TracedMono.java:24)
at reactor.core.publisher.MonoDefer.subscribe(MonoDefer.java:52)
at reactor.core.publisher.Mono.subscribe(Mono.java:4150)
at com.jojotech.apigateway.common.TracedMono.subscribe(TracedMono.java:24)
at reactor.core.publisher.MonoDefer.subscribe(MonoDefer.java:52)
at reactor.core.publisher.Mono.subscribe(Mono.java:4150)
at com.jojotech.apigateway.common.TracedMono.subscribe(TracedMono.java:24)
at reactor.core.publisher.MonoDefer.subscribe(MonoDefer.java:52)
at reactor.core.publisher.Mono.subscribe(Mono.java:4150)
at com.jojotech.apigateway.common.TracedMono.subscribe(TracedMono.java:24)
at reactor.core.publisher.MonoDefer.subscribe(MonoDefer.java:52)
at reactor.core.publisher.Mono.subscribe(Mono.java:4150)
at com.jojotech.apigateway.common.TracedMono.subscribe(TracedMono.java:24)
at reactor.core.publisher.MonoDefer.subscribe(MonoDefer.java:52)
at reactor.core.publisher.Mono.subscribe(Mono.java:4150)
at com.jojotech.apigateway.common.TracedMono.subscribe(TracedMono.java:24)
at reactor.core.publisher.MonoDefer.subscribe(MonoDefer.java:52)
at reactor.core.publisher.InternalMonoOperator.subscribe(InternalMonoOperator.java:64)
at reactor.core.publisher.MonoDefer.subscribe(MonoDefer.java:52)
at reactor.core.publisher.MonoDefer.subscribe(MonoDefer.java:52)
at reactor.core.publisher.Mono.subscribe(Mono.java:4150)
at reactor.core.publisher.MonoIgnoreThen$ThenIgnoreMain.subscribeNext(MonoIgnoreThen.java:255)
at reactor.core.publisher.MonoIgnoreThen.subscribe(MonoIgnoreThen.java:51)
at reactor.core.publisher.MonoFlatMap$FlatMapMain.onNext(MonoFlatMap.java:157)
at reactor.core.publisher.FluxSwitchIfEmpty$SwitchIfEmptySubscriber.onNext(FluxSwitchIfEmpty.java:73)
at reactor.core.publisher.MonoNext$NextSubscriber.onNext(MonoNext.java:82)
at reactor.core.publisher.FluxConcatMap$ConcatMapImmediate.innerNext(FluxConcatMap.java:281)
at reactor.core.publisher.FluxConcatMap$ConcatMapInner.onNext(FluxConcatMap.java:860)
at reactor.core.publisher.FluxMap$MapSubscriber.onNext(FluxMap.java:120)
at reactor.core.publisher.FluxSwitchIfEmpty$SwitchIfEmptySubscriber.onNext(FluxSwitchIfEmpty.java:73)
at reactor.core.publisher.Operators$MonoSubscriber.complete(Operators.java:1815)
at reactor.core.publisher.MonoFlatMap$FlatMapMain.onNext(MonoFlatMap.java:151)
at reactor.core.publisher.FluxMap$MapSubscriber.onNext(FluxMap.java:120)
at reactor.core.publisher.MonoNext$NextSubscriber.onNext(MonoNext.java:82)
at reactor.core.publisher.FluxConcatMap$ConcatMapImmediate.innerNext(FluxConcatMap.java:281)
at reactor.core.publisher.FluxConcatMap$ConcatMapInner.onNext(FluxConcatMap.java:860)
at reactor.core.publisher.FluxOnErrorResume$ResumeSubscriber.onNext(FluxOnErrorResume.java:79)
at reactor.core.publisher.MonoPeekTerminal$MonoTerminalPeekSubscriber.onNext(MonoPeekTerminal.java:180)
at reactor.core.publisher.Operators$MonoSubscriber.complete(Operators.java:1815)
at reactor.core.publisher.MonoFilterWhen$MonoFilterWhenMain.onNext(MonoFilterWhen.java:149)
at reactor.core.publisher.Operators$ScalarSubscription.request(Operators.java:2397)
at reactor.core.publisher.MonoFilterWhen$MonoFilterWhenMain.onSubscribe(MonoFilterWhen.java:112)
at reactor.core.publisher.MonoJust.subscribe(MonoJust.java:54)
at reactor.core.publisher.Mono.subscribe(Mono.java:4150)
at reactor.core.publisher.FluxConcatMap$ConcatMapImmediate.drain(FluxConcatMap.java:448)
at reactor.core.publisher.FluxConcatMap$ConcatMapImmediate.onNext(FluxConcatMap.java:250)
at reactor.core.publisher.FluxDematerialize$DematerializeSubscriber.onNext(FluxDematerialize.java:98)
at reactor.core.publisher.FluxDematerialize$DematerializeSubscriber.onNext(FluxDematerialize.java:44)
at reactor.core.publisher.FluxIterable$IterableSubscription.slowPath(FluxIterable.java:270)
at reactor.core.publisher.FluxIterable$IterableSubscription.request(FluxIterable.java:228)
at reactor.core.publisher.FluxDematerialize$DematerializeSubscriber.request(FluxDematerialize.java:127)
at reactor.core.publisher.FluxConcatMap$ConcatMapImmediate.onSubscribe(FluxConcatMap.java:235)
at reactor.core.publisher.FluxDematerialize$DematerializeSubscriber.onSubscribe(FluxDematerialize.java:77)
at reactor.core.publisher.FluxIterable.subscribe(FluxIterable.java:164)
at reactor.core.publisher.FluxIterable.subscribe(FluxIterable.java:86)
at reactor.core.publisher.InternalFluxOperator.subscribe(InternalFluxOperator.java:62)
at reactor.core.publisher.FluxDefer.subscribe(FluxDefer.java:54)
at reactor.core.publisher.Mono.subscribe(Mono.java:4150)
at reactor.core.publisher.FluxConcatMap$ConcatMapImmediate.drain(FluxConcatMap.java:448)
at reactor.core.publisher.FluxConcatMap$ConcatMapImmediate.onSubscribe(FluxConcatMap.java:218)
at reactor.core.publisher.FluxIterable.subscribe(FluxIterable.java:164)
at reactor.core.publisher.FluxIterable.subscribe(FluxIterable.java:86)
at reactor.core.publisher.InternalMonoOperator.subscribe(InternalMonoOperator.java:64)
at reactor.core.publisher.MonoDefer.subscribe(MonoDefer.java:52)
at reactor.core.publisher.InternalMonoOperator.subscribe(InternalMonoOperator.java:64)
at reactor.core.publisher.MonoDefer.subscribe(MonoDefer.java:52)
at org.springframework.cloud.sleuth.instrument.web.TraceWebFilter$MonoWebFilterTrace.subscribe(TraceWebFilter.java:184)
at reactor.core.publisher.InternalMonoOperator.subscribe(InternalMonoOperator.java:64)
at reactor.core.publisher.MonoDefer.subscribe(MonoDefer.java:52)
at reactor.core.publisher.InternalMonoOperator.subscribe(InternalMonoOperator.java:64)
at reactor.core.publisher.MonoDefer.subscribe(MonoDefer.java:52)
at reactor.core.publisher.InternalMonoOperator.subscribe(InternalMonoOperator.java:64)
at reactor.core.publisher.MonoDefer.subscribe(MonoDefer.java:52)
at reactor.core.publisher.Mono.subscribe(Mono.java:4150)
at reactor.core.publisher.MonoIgnoreThen$ThenIgnoreMain.subscribeNext(MonoIgnoreThen.java:255)
at reactor.core.publisher.MonoIgnoreThen.subscribe(MonoIgnoreThen.java:51)
at reactor.core.publisher.InternalMonoOperator.subscribe(InternalMonoOperator.java:64)
at reactor.netty.http.server.HttpServer$HttpServerHandle.onStateChange(HttpServer.java:915)
at reactor.netty.ReactorNetty$CompositeConnectionObserver.onStateChange(ReactorNetty.java:654)
at reactor.netty.transport.ServerTransport$ChildObserver.onStateChange(ServerTransport.java:478)
at reactor.netty.http.server.HttpServerOperations.onInboundNext(HttpServerOperations.java:526)
at reactor.netty.channel.ChannelOperationsHandler.channelRead(ChannelOperationsHandler.java:94)
at io.netty.channel.AbstractChannelHandlerContext.invokeChannelRead(AbstractChannelHandlerContext.java:379)
at io.netty.channel.AbstractChannelHandlerContext.invokeChannelRead(AbstractChannelHandlerContext.java:365)
at io.netty.channel.AbstractChannelHandlerContext.fireChannelRead(AbstractChannelHandlerContext.java:357)
at reactor.netty.http.server.HttpTrafficHandler.channelRead(HttpTrafficHandler.java:209)
at io.netty.channel.AbstractChannelHandlerContext.invokeChannelRead(AbstractChannelHandlerContext.java:379)
at io.netty.channel.AbstractChannelHandlerContext.invokeChannelRead(AbstractChannelHandlerContext.java:365)
at io.netty.channel.AbstractChannelHandlerContext.fireChannelRead(AbstractChannelHandlerContext.java:357)
at reactor.netty.http.server.logging.AccessLogHandlerH1.channelRead(AccessLogHandlerH1.java:59)
at io.netty.channel.AbstractChannelHandlerContext.invokeChannelRead(AbstractChannelHandlerContext.java:379)
at io.netty.channel.AbstractChannelHandlerContext.invokeChannelRead(AbstractChannelHandlerContext.java:365)
at io.netty.channel.AbstractChannelHandlerContext.fireChannelRead(AbstractChannelHandlerContext.java:357)
at io.netty.channel.CombinedChannelDuplexHandler$DelegatingChannelHandlerContext.fireChannelRead(CombinedChannelDuplexHandler.java:436)
at io.netty.handler.codec.ByteToMessageDecoder.fireChannelRead(ByteToMessageDecoder.java:324)
at io.netty.handler.codec.ByteToMessageDecoder.channelRead(ByteToMessageDecoder.java:296)
at io.netty.channel.CombinedChannelDuplexHandler.channelRead(CombinedChannelDuplexHandler.java:251)
at io.netty.channel.AbstractChannelHandlerContext.invokeChannelRead(AbstractChannelHandlerContext.java:379)
at io.netty.channel.AbstractChannelHandlerContext.invokeChannelRead(AbstractChannelHandlerContext.java:365)
at io.netty.channel.AbstractChannelHandlerContext.fireChannelRead(AbstractChannelHandlerContext.java:357)
at io.netty.channel.DefaultChannelPipeline$HeadContext.channelRead(DefaultChannelPipeline.java:1410)
at io.netty.channel.AbstractChannelHandlerContext.invokeChannelRead(AbstractChannelHandlerContext.java:379)
at io.netty.channel.AbstractChannelHandlerContext.invokeChannelRead(AbstractChannelHandlerContext.java:365)
at io.netty.channel.DefaultChannelPipeline.fireChannelRead(DefaultChannelPipeline.java:919)
at io.netty.channel.nio.AbstractNioByteChannel$NioByteUnsafe.read(AbstractNioByteChannel.java:166)
at io.netty.channel.nio.NioEventLoop.processSelectedKey(NioEventLoop.java:719)
at io.netty.channel.nio.NioEventLoop.processSelectedKeysOptimized(NioEventLoop.java:655)
at io.netty.channel.nio.NioEventLoop.processSelectedKeys(NioEventLoop.java:581)
at io.netty.channel.nio.NioEventLoop.run(NioEventLoop.java:493)
at io.netty.util.concurrent.SingleThreadEventExecutor$4.run(SingleThreadEventExecutor.java:989)
at io.netty.util.internal.ThreadExecutorMap$2.run(ThreadExecutorMap.java:74)
at io.netty.util.concurrent.FastThreadLocalRunnable.run(FastThreadLocalRunnable.java:30)
at java.lang.Thread.run(java.base@11.0.8/Thread.java:834)
发现 http 线程没有卡在健康检查，同时其他线程也没有任何和健康检查相关的堆栈（异步环境下，健康检查也是异步的，其中某些过程可能交给其他线程）。所以，健康检查请求应该是还没被执行就超时取消了。
那么为啥会这样呢？于此同时，我还发现这里用的是 RedisTemplate，是 spring-data-redis 的同步 Redis API。我猛然想起来之前写这里的代码的时候，因为只是验证一个 key 是否存在和修改 key 的过期时间，偷懒没有用异步 API。这里是不是因为使用同步 API 阻塞了 http 线程导致的雪崩呢？
我们来验证下这个猜想：我们的项目中 redis 操作是通过 spring-data-redis + Lettuce 连接池，启用并且增加了关于 Lettuce 命令的 JFR 监控，可以参考我的这篇文章：这个 Redis 连接池的新监控方式针不戳~我再加一点佐料，截至目前我的 pull request 已经合并，这个特性会在 6.2.x 版本发布。我们看下出问题时间附近的 Redis 命令采集，如下图所示：
我们来简单计算下执行 Redis 命令导致的阻塞时间（我们的采集是 10s 一次，count 是命令次数，时间单位是微秒）：使用这里的命令个数乘以 50% 的中位数，除以 10（因为是 10s），得出每秒因为执行 Redis 命令导致的阻塞时间：
32*152=4864
1*860=860
5*163=815
32*176=5632
1*178=178
16959*168=2849112
774*176=136224
3144*166=521904
17343*179=3104397
702*166=116532
总和 6740518
6740518 / 10 = 674051.8 us = 0.67s
这个仅仅是使用中位数计算的阻塞时间，从图上的分布其实可以看出真正的值应该比这个大，这样很有可能每秒需要在 Redis 同步接口上阻塞的时间就超过了 1s，不断地请求，请求没有减少，从而导致了请求越积越多，最后雪崩。
并且由于是阻塞接口，线程很多时间消耗在等待 io 了，所以 CPU 上不去，导致没有自动扩容。业务高峰时，由于有设定好的预先扩容，导致网关单实例没有达到出问题的压力，所以没问题。
解决问题
我们来改写原有代码，使用同步 spring-data-redis Api 原有代码是(其实就是 spring-cloud-gateway 的 Filter 接口的核心方法 public Mono<Void> traced(ServerWebExchange exchange, GatewayFilterChain chain) 的方法体)：
if (StringUtils.isBlank(token)) {
//如果 token 不存在，则根据路径决定继续请求还是返回需要登录的状态码
return continueOrUnauthorized(path, exchange, chain, headers);
} else {
try {
String accessTokenValue = redisTemplate.opsForValue().get(token);
if (StringUtils.isNotBlank(accessTokenValue)) {
//如果 accessTokenValue 不为空，则续期 4 小时，保证登录用户只要有操作就不会让 token 过期
Long expire = redisTemplate.getExpire(token);
log.info("accessTokenValue = {}, expire = {}", accessTokenValue, expire);
if (expire != null && expire < 4 * 60 * 60) {
redisTemplate.expire(token, 4, TimeUnit.HOURS);
}
//解析，获取 userId
JSONObject accessToken = JSON.parseObject(accessTokenValue);
String userId = accessToken.getString("userId");
//如果 userId 不为空才合法
if (StringUtils.isNotBlank(userId)) {
//解析 Token
HttpHeaders newHeaders = parse(accessToken);
//继续请求
return FilterUtil.changeRequestHeader(exchange, chain, newHeaders);
}
}
} catch (Exception e) {
log.error("read accessToken error: {}", e.getMessage(), e);
}
//如果 token 不合法，则根据路径决定继续请求还是返回需要登录的状态码
return continueOrUnauthorized(path, exchange, chain, headers);
}
改成使用异步：
if (StringUtils.isBlank(token)) {
return continueOrUnauthorized(path, exchange, chain, headers);
} else {
HttpHeaders finalHeaders = headers;
//必须使用 tracedPublisherFactory 包裹，否则链路信息会丢失，这里参考我的另一篇文章：Spring Cloud Gateway 没有链路信息，我 TM 人傻了
return tracedPublisherFactory.getTracedMono(
redisTemplate.opsForValue().get(token)
//必须切换线程，否则后续线程使用的还是 Redisson 的线程，如果耗时长则会影响其他使用 Redis 的业务，并且这个耗时也算在 Redis 连接命令超时中
.publishOn(Schedulers.parallel()),
exchange
).doOnSuccess(accessTokenValue -> {
if (accessTokenValue != null) {
//accessToken续期,4小时
tracedPublisherFactory.getTracedMono(redisTemplate.getExpire(token).publishOn(Schedulers.parallel()), exchange).doOnSuccess(expire -> {
log.info("accessTokenValue = {}, expire = {}", accessTokenValue, expire);
if (expire != null && expire.toHours() < 4) {
redisTemplate.expire(token, Duration.ofHours(4)).subscribe();
}
}).subscribe();
}
})
//必须转换成非 null，否则 flatmap 不会执行；也不能在末尾用 switchIfEmpty，因为整体返回的是 Mono<Void> 本来里面承载的就是空的，会导致每个请求发送两遍。
.defaultIfEmpty("")
.flatMap(accessTokenValue -> {
try {
if (StringUtils.isNotBlank(accessTokenValue)) {
JSONObject accessToken = JSON.parseObject(accessTokenValue);
String userId = accessToken.getString("userId");
if (StringUtils.isNotBlank(userId)) {
//解析 Token
HttpHeaders newHeaders = parse(accessToken);
//继续请求
return FilterUtil.changeRequestHeader(exchange, chain, newHeaders);
}
}
return continueOrUnauthorized(path, exchange, chain, finalHeaders);
} catch (Exception e) {
log.error("read accessToken error: {}", e.getMessage(), e);
return continueOrUnauthorized(path, exchange, chain, finalHeaders);
}
});
}
这里有几个注意点：
1.Spring-Cloud-Sleuth 对于 Spring-WebFlux 中做的链路追踪优先，如果我们在 Filter 中创建新的 Flux 或者 Mono，这里面是没有链路信息的，需要我们手动加入。这个可以参考我的另一篇文章：Spring Cloud Gateway 没有链路信息，我 TM 人傻了
2.spring-data-redis + Lettuce 连接池的组合，对于异步接口，我们最好在获取响应之后切换成别的线程池执行，否则后续线程使用的还是 Redisson 的线程，如果耗时长则会影响其他使用 Redis 的业务，并且这个耗时也算在 Redis 连接命令超时中
3.Project Reactor 如果中间结果有 null 值，则后面的 flatmap、map 等流操作就不执行了。如果在这里终止，前端收到的响应是有问题的。所以中间结果我们要在每一步考虑 null 问题。
4.spring-cloud-gateway 的核心 GatewayFilter 接口，核心方法返回的是 Mono<Void>。Mono 本来里面承载的就是空的，导致我们不能使用末尾的 switchIfEmpty 来简化中间步骤的 null，如果用了会导致每个请求发送两遍。
这样修改后，压测了下网关，单实例 2w qps 请求也没有出现这个问题了。
点赞收藏
分类：
