性能文章>MySQL 死锁套路:再来看一例走不同索引更新的例子>

MySQL 死锁套路:再来看一例走不同索引更新的例子原创

740703

前面有文章介绍了利用调试MySQL源码的方式来调试锁相关的信息,这里利用这个工具来解决一个比较简单的问题,线上的表字段较多,这里简单成为了一个表:

CREATE TABLE `t3` (
  `id` int(11) NOT NULL AUTO_INCREMENT,
  `a` varchar(5) COLLATE utf8mb4_unicode_ci NOT NULL DEFAULT '',
  `b` varchar(5) COLLATE utf8mb4_unicode_ci NOT NULL DEFAULT '',
  PRIMARY KEY (`id`),UNIQUE KEY `uk_a` (`a`), KEY `idx_b` (`b`) 
)

sql语句如下

t1
update t3 set b = '' where a = "1";

t2
update t3 set b = '' where b = "2";

我们先用之前debug的方式来看一下,这里两条语句分别加了哪些锁

第一条语句(通过唯一索引去更新记录)

update t3 set b = ‘’ where a = “1”;
image.png

image.png

image.png
整理一下,加了3个X锁,顺序分别是
image.png

第二条语句

update t3 set b = ‘’ where b = “2”;
image.png
image.png
image.png
整理一下,加了3个X锁,顺序分别是
image.png
两条语句从加锁顺序看起来就已经有构成死锁的条件了
image.png
手动是比较难模拟的,写个代码去跑一下
马上就出现了

------------------------
LATEST DETECTED DEADLOCK
------------------------
181102 12:45:05
*** (1) TRANSACTION:
TRANSACTION 50AF, ACTIVE 0 sec starting index read
mysql tables in use 1, locked 1
LOCK WAIT 3 lock struct(s), heap size 376, 2 row lock(s)
MySQL thread id 34, OS thread handle 0x70000d842000, query id 549 localhost 127.0.0.1 root Searching rows for update
update t3 set b = '' where b = "2"
*** (1) WAITING FOR THIS LOCK TO BE GRANTED:
RECORD LOCKS space id 67 page no 3 n bits 72 index `PRIMARY` of table `d1`.`t3` trx id 50AF lock_mode X locks rec but not gap waiting
Record lock, heap no 2 PHYSICAL RECORD: n_fields 5; compact format; info bits 0
 0: len 4; hex 80000001; asc     ;;
 1: len 6; hex 0000000050ae; asc     P ;;
 2: len 7; hex 03000001341003; asc     4  ;;
 3: len 1; hex 31; asc 1;;
 4: len 0; hex ; asc ;;

*** (2) TRANSACTION:
TRANSACTION 50AE, ACTIVE 0 sec updating or deleting
mysql tables in use 1, locked 1
4 lock struct(s), heap size 1248, 3 row lock(s), undo log entries 1
MySQL thread id 35, OS thread handle 0x70000d885000, query id 548 localhost 127.0.0.1 root Updating
update t3 set b = '' where a = "1"
*** (2) HOLDS THE LOCK(S):
RECORD LOCKS space id 67 page no 3 n bits 72 index `PRIMARY` of table `d1`.`t3` trx id 50AE lock_mode X locks rec but not gap
Record lock, heap no 2 PHYSICAL RECORD: n_fields 5; compact format; info bits 0
 0: len 4; hex 80000001; asc     ;;
 1: len 6; hex 0000000050ae; asc     P ;;
 2: len 7; hex 03000001341003; asc     4  ;;
 3: len 1; hex 31; asc 1;;
 4: len 0; hex ; asc ;;

*** (2) WAITING FOR THIS LOCK TO BE GRANTED:
RECORD LOCKS space id 67 page no 5 n bits 72 index `idx_b` of table `d1`.`t3` trx id 50AE lock_mode X locks rec but not gap waiting
Record lock, heap no 2 PHYSICAL RECORD: n_fields 2; compact format; info bits 0
 0: len 1; hex 32; asc 2;;
 1: len 4; hex 80000001; asc     ;;

*** WE ROLL BACK TRANSACTION (1)

跟我们线上的死锁日志一模一样~

点赞收藏
挖坑的张师傅

机械工业出版社《深入理解 JVM 字节码》作者,掘金小册作者《JVM 字节码从入门到精通》、《深入理解TCP 协议》作者,Vim 死忠粉、Kotlin&Go 爱好者、能抓一手好包、喜欢底层技术和分享。微信公众号:张师傅的博客(shifuzhang01)

请先登录,感受更多精彩内容
快去登录吧,你将获得
  • 浏览更多精彩评论
  • 和开发者讨论交流,共同进步

为你推荐

JDBC PreparedStatement 字段值为null导致TBase带宽飙升的案例分析

JDBC PreparedStatement 字段值为null导致TBase带宽飙升的案例分析

随机一门技术分享之Netty

随机一门技术分享之Netty

MappedByteBuffer VS FileChannel:从内核层面对比两者的性能差异

MappedByteBuffer VS FileChannel:从内核层面对比两者的性能差异

日常Bug排查-偶发性读数据不一致

日常Bug排查-偶发性读数据不一致

3
0